logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.11.19 2014고단3417
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million, Defendant B, and C, respectively, by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner who operates a marina business with the trade name of "E" on the third and fourth floor of the building located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and Defendant B worked as an employee who manages the said business by helping the business owner such as customer guidance at the said business place. Defendant C worked as an employee in charge of the carter management in the said business place.

The Defendants, at the above business place, equipped with the shower facilities and 9 smuggling, and employed F, etc. as female employees on the condition that 60,000 won per customer would be paid, on condition that 60,000 won per customer would be paid, and had the said F, on December 2, 2013 and on March 26, 2014, receive 1.30,000 won for each of the said business places and 1.30,000 won for each of the said business places, and had the said F, on condition that she would be sexual intercourse with the said G

As a result, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic through two times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspects concerning G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines, respectively, in all of the relevant Articles of the Acts and the choice of punishment

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (the defendants);

1. Additional collection (Defendant A) Article 25 of the Act on the Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. The sentence as ordered is imposed in consideration of all the circumstances, including Defendant A and B’s reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the defendants), the defendants’ business period and revenue size, the degree of involvement of the defendants, age, character and conduct, family relation, motive, means and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

arrow