logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.03.16 2017고단6224
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【The Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at Jeju District Court on January 29, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence at Jeju Prison on August 30, 2017.

【Criminal facts】 around December 19:50 on December 5, 2017, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol to the victim with the attitude that: (a) around December 19, 2017, the victim D, operated by the victim D, on the first underground floor in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, ordered the victim to pay the alcohol value normally.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have the means of settlement, such as cash, so even if he was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the consideration.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, was provided 30 sick 30 tons in the total market value of 505,000 won, such as beer and beer, from the victim.

On November 26, 2017, 2017, the Defendant ordered the victim with the attitude that the Defendant would normally pay the alcohol value to the victim at the H main point operated by the victim G of F2 in Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and that the Defendant ordered the victim with the alcohol and the alcohol.

However, at the time, the defendant had only 12,400 won in cash, but did not have any other means of payment necessary for the settlement of alcoholic beverage value, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if he was provided with alcoholic beverage and alcohol from the injured party.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with a total of KRW 330,000, such as 20 bottles and 1 Ansans.

"2018 Highest 480"

1. On October 21, 2017, around 00:00, the Defendant ordered the victim with the attitude that: (a) the victim J was operated by the victim J of the damage located in the North Gun/Sinsan-si; and (b) the victim with the attitude that the victim would have shown to pay the alcohol value normally.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have the means of settlement, such as cash, so even if he was provided with alcohol and alcohol from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the consideration.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such.

arrow