logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 12. 21. 선고 2017두62532 판결
감정평가액은 취득가액에 해당하지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu51534 ( October 20, 2017)

Title

The appraised value shall not be the acquisition value.

Summary

Capital expenditure refers to the expenses disbursed in order to extend the useful life of the transferred asset or to increase its value, or the expenses disbursed for altering, improving, or using convenience as above. The above amount claimed by the Plaintiff is not the expenses actually disbursed but merely the appraised value, and it does not constitute capital expenditure.

Related statutes

Income Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2017Du62532 ( December 21, 2017)

Plaintiff-Appellant

Kim*

Defendant-Appellee

○○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu51534 Decided 2017.20

Imposition of Judgment

December 21, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow