Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
Defendant
If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2018 High Court Decision 1074]
1. At around 11:30 on February 14, 2018, Defendant A interfered with the performance of duties interfered with the management of the apartment complex over about 15 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as raising a disturbance by 10 minutes, from among the employees of the management office in the name-free manner in the management office located at the Namyang-si apartment management office, Defendant A interfered with the management affairs of the apartment complex, and continuously sought for the same reason on the same day at around 14:00, and interfered with the management affairs of the apartment complex over 15 minutes by spreading salt on the books of the victim D, who is the head of the management office.
2. On February 14, 2018, at the same place as the above 14:00, Defendant A, at the same time as the above 14:00, inflicted an injury on the victim D, who is the head of the management office, by spawning salt, spawning head debt with spawn, walking through a spawn, sating face with a satch with a satch, and asking the victim for approximately one week medical treatment.
[2018 high-level 1269] On February 3, 2018, Defendant A damaged the victim’s reputation by openly stating that “F was used by FF by receiving KRW 300,000,00 from the site warden of C Apartment-si, Nam-si, Seoul Metropolitan City, by openly stating that “The fact that F was used by F to receive KRW 300,000 from the site warden of C Apartment-dong, despite having not received money from the elderly president E and residents.”
(2) On February 8, 2018, Defendant A infringed the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out the false fact that “C Apartment Management Director D, who illegally manipulates the representative ballot box and want to leave the C apartment, shall go against himself/herself and want to leave the C apartment,” in the first room of the organization where 19 members of the HH of the right to lifelong education at Yangyang-si, where the victim was affiliated, although the victim did not unlawfully manipulate the ballot box at a place where he/she was located.”
Summary of Evidence
[2018 High Court Decision 1074]
1. Part of the defendant A.