The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has the record of receiving criminal punishment (two times of imprisonment and two times of suspended execution) on several occasions for the same criminal acts, and in particular, on March 13, 2014, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence by having been sentenced to three months of suspended execution for the same criminal acts and by having been sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same criminal acts as of March 13, 2014, and having been sentenced to suspension of execution for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second time for the second day for the second day for the second time for the second day for the second time for the second day for the second day for the second time for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the second day for the crime.

Pursuant to the recommendation type of items, medication, possession, basic crimes and concurrent crimes (aggravated, aggravated factors - previous crimes of the same kind): Imprisonment with prison labor for one year to three years, and concurrent crimes: Type 1 of habitual repeated crime damage and damage of the damaged crime group, Type 2 of recommendation type of concurrent crimes (a victim in the basic sphere shall not be punished because he/she would not have the same repair cost as that of the accused).