The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant made a confession of the crime of this case while committing the crime of this case, the victim of the crime of causing property damage and the victim of the crime of this case already agreed to do so at the investigation stage, and the amount of philophones handled by the Defendant is low. However, the crime of this case is not good in the nature of the crime because of the damage of property owned by the victim (leased) such as opening the window from a philophones purchased from the victim in his own residence after the administration of the philophones in his own residence, and leaving the window out of the clograms, etc., in light of the addiction to narcotics and harm caused by medication of narcotics, it is necessary to strictly punish and eradicate narcotics crimes; in light of the result of the clophonephones evaluation results from "training" reaction, it seems that the degree of clophone addiction addiction of the Defendant appears that the Defendant had been somewhat subject to criminal punishment for the same type of crime of this case (three times suspended sentence and one time). In particular, the Defendant appears to have been sentenced to the sentencing guidelines for the same type of crime of this case after being executed.

Title, medication), recommendation type for basic crimes (aggravating, aggravated factors - previous and previous crimes less than 3 years): Imprisonment with prison labor for one year or 3 years; concurrent crimes: general standard of the group of destroyed and damaged crimes; recommendation type for concurrent crimes (aggravating areas, mitigation factors, mitigation factors - mitigation factors): Imprisonment for one month or 6 months; the scope of final recommendation type due to aggravating multiple crimes; one year or 3 months); and others.