logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2015.01.21 2014가합6794
전세보증금반환등
Text

1. The Defendant’s annual interest in KRW 1,889,809 and KRW 1,131,590 among the Plaintiff, from June 29, 2014 to January 21, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 18, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant to lease (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) each of the lease deposit amounting to 135 million won and the lease deposit amounting to 501 Dong-dong 1201 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) from the Defendant, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”) from the Defendant. At that time, the Plaintiff paid 135 million won to the Defendant around the lease deposit amount and received delivery of the instant apartment from the Defendant.

B. In January 2013, while the Plaintiff was living in the instant apartment from the Defendant, the Plaintiff replaced the hot water meter into KRW 32,00,00, and the hot water meter was replaced by the hot water meter into KRW 32,00,00. On the ground that water leakage under 401, the lower floor was generated due to the hot water meter’s wave, and 7.51,000,000 won. On April 2013, the front door key of the instant apartment was changed by the 150,000,000,000 won.

C. The Plaintiff deposited the long-term repair appropriations on behalf of the Defendant, the owner of the instant apartment, while residing in the instant apartment.

The defendant notified the plaintiff that he will terminate the lease relationship when the lease term expires before the expiration of the lease term of this case, and the plaintiff also notified the defendant that he will return the lease deposit to another place when the lease term expires.

E. The instant lease agreement terminated on June 27, 2014, and the Plaintiff moved from the instant apartment to another place on June 28, 2014, and notified the Defendant of the fact of eviction and demanded the return of the lease deposit. On August 8, 2014, the Defendant returned the lease deposit KRW 135 million to the Plaintiff.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including branch numbers in case of additional number) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

arrow