logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.01.17 2018가합100178
소유권방해예방 및 위자료 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant

A. Of the area of 602 square meters in Asia-si, it shall be in sequence 1 and 2.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff owns D Large 550 square meters and its ground houses in ASEAN-si.

B. Of the instant land, the Defendant installed a reinforced retaining wall in the order of their respective points, which are part of the boundary between the said Plaintiff’s land and that of the said land. Around August 2016, the Defendant removed the retaining wall of the said reinforced land and installed a concrete retaining wall of at least 2 meters (hereinafter “instant retaining wall”). (c) On September 28, 2016, the Defendant filed a criminal charge against the Defendant on the boundary line, and on July 7, 2017, the Defendant was punished by a summary order of KRW 30 meters in length on the existing retaining wall and KRW 20 meters in height on the land.”

Daejeon District Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 1332. D.

On August 2016, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition to Asan Viewing, and the Defendant removed the part of the retaining wall exceeding 2 meters.

On November 2016, Asan Viewers issued a corrective order to restore it to its original state to its original state.

At the end of January 2017, the defendant opened 2/3 of the concrete wall thickness of the retaining wall of this case with the thickness of 10cm.

E. On August 9, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a civil petition against the Plaintiff on the safety of a concrete wall, and the Defendant filed an application for construction dispute mediation with the Plaintiff on August 9, 2017, and the Building Dispute Mediation Committee, on October 22, 2017, following the procedure of conducting on-site investigations, etc.

arrow