logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.10.10 2013고단646
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 12, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million by the Suwon District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On January 28, 2011, the Seoul Central District Court issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act and a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On January 31, 2012, this Court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 4 months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act on February 8, 2012.

On June 1, 2013, around 23:04, the Defendant driven a DNA-learning car under the influence of 0.209% of blood alcohol concentration without obtaining a driver's license in a section of about 500 meters from the road near the Manyang-gu, Anyang-gu, Anyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the state of driving under the influence of alcohol, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of inquiries, such as criminal records, etc., references to the previous dispositions, and reporting results of confirmation Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has committed the same kind of crime and has been punished several times, and also committed the crime of this case during the suspended execution period due to the same kind of crime, and the drinking water is considerably high, and the quality of the crime is not good.

However, the defendant is now going against his depth to avoid committing these crimes again, and the circumstances favorable to the defendant such as the family relationship of the defendant are considered as the disposition of the fine.

arrow