logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.20 2016고정359
축산물위생관리법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of the defendant B corporation that has been located in E in E in terms of harmony.

1. Defendant A

A. From June 24, 2015 to August 27, 2015, the Defendant, at the place of business of the Company B located in Sungsung-si, received a request from the competent authorities for meat packaging business from “F” G without obtaining permission, and operated meat packaging business upon receiving a request from the competent authorities, as shown in attached Table 1, for seven times, as in attached Table 1, a total of 7 cm meat of milch meat (based on c,310 kilograms) slaughtered on seven occasions, as in attached Table 1, and operated meat packaging business after receiving KRW 70,00,000 from the said G.

B. From June 24, 2015 to September 16, 2015, the Defendant did not indicate the name of the product, the type of meat, the name of parts, the circulation period, and the content of the products to be indicated in accordance with the standards for the labelling of the livestock products publicly notified by the Minister of Food and Drug Safety while manufacturing 1,260 g of milch meat with the milch meat slaughtered nine 9 cm total of milch meat (on the basis of weight 4,200 g) for nine times, as in attached crime inundation 2 in the workplace of B Co., Ltd., Ltd., E and E, E, E, and E, from Jun. 24, 2015 to Sep. 16, 2015.

(c)

The Defendant, from September 12, 2015 to September 16, 2015, at the workplace of B Co., Ltd., Ltd. located in E and E in P, from Sep. 12, 2015 to Sep. 16, 2015, manufactures and sells milch meat and f13.8kg in total, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Table 3, and supplies “B king YP Y to consumers at the slaughterhouse and processing plant.”

The phrase "B corporation it operated with the phrase was falsely labeled differently from the fact as if it was certified from the place of work as the safety management certification standards by the Minister of Food and Drug Safety."

2. Defendant B Co., Ltd. committed each act of violation as described in paragraph (1) by Defendant A, a representative of Defendant B Co., Ltd.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police in relation to G.

arrow