1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 29, 2014, while becoming a member of the Hyundai Motor Corporation B factory on February 2, 2004, the Plaintiff filed an application for the diagnosis with the Defendant on October 29, 2014, asserting that “The Defendant received the application for the diagnosis of the instant medical care benefit by asserting that the Defendant was in need of installation of the sprink among the process of installing the FG internal assembly strings in a string box around June 15:40, 2012, by using the sprink to turn out the sprink to about 90 degrees during the spacking of the spacked and being pushed up with the sprink up at least 90 degrees during the spacking period (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. On December 26, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff, upon deliberation by the Occupational Disease Determination Committee, did not confirm whether the level of acute damage was caused, and that it was caused by an escape that had been a long time since it was difficult to view the Plaintiff as having carried out the duty to bear the shoulder continuously on the left-hand side due to robbery to the extent of inducing the injury in the instant case, and that there was no proximate causal relation between the duty and the injury was deliberated on on the ground that there was no possibility of proximate causal relation between the duty and the injury.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2, Gap evidence 2-2, Gap evidence 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the injury or disease of this case was caused by the Plaintiff’s occupational disease that occurred due to the instant accident, which led to the Defendant’s mistake, because the Plaintiff’s entry into the said B factory and repeated use of the goods as inappropriate in the car manufacturer for nine years.