1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 21, 2013, the Plaintiff, as an employee of the Weather Vehicle Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Non-Party Company”), was diagnosed with “protruding from the 1-2 conical test,” and applied for medical care benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act to the Defendant on March 11, 2013.

B. The Defendant: (a) acknowledged occupational disease in light of the long-term working force, the degree of the burden of care on the part of the work; (b) the protruding escape certificate between the 3-4 and the protruding escape certificate between the 7-1st and the 7nd-1st to the 1st century during a long-term work period; (c) observed a protruding disc and the pro rata-1st to the whole trend; and (d) determined that it is an individual disease with low relevance to the duties because it is difficult to see that the duty, the duty, the duty, and the duty of the worker, etc. are difficult to be deemed to be a work, and thus low relevance to the duties, according to the results of the deliberation by the Occupational Disease Determination Committee, he/she approved medical care benefits for the escape from the protruding, which is the 1-2nd to the 1-2nd to the 3-4th to the 7th to the 7th to the 1st to the 7th to the 1st to the 1st to the present (hereinafter).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 4, Eul 2 (including virtual number; hereinafter the same shall apply), 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On July 3, 1986, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she joined the non-party company and carried out the operation of the fore and towing vehicle, the loading of parts, and the heating operation. On March 26, 2011, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the instant injury and disease on January 21, 201, when driving the towing vehicle, and after the accident that conflicts with the fore and the fore and the fore and the fore that employee was driving, the pains of the trees and the shoulder that he/she experienced in the fore and the shoulder were more serious. On December 28, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the fore and on January 21, 2013.

In other words, the plaintiff's business and the case are the plaintiff's business since the plaintiff had a lot of burden on the part of the table for a long time and the disease of this case occurred.