The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected in the judgment, and that the damaged police officer submitted a written application for the correction of the defendant's wife.

However, considering that the crime of this case interferes with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers dispatched after receiving 112 reports, the nature of the crime is not good, the degree of interference with official duties is not weak, and several times of punishment for violent crimes, etc., the sentencing of the court below seems to have been properly determined by fully considering all the circumstances including the reasons for sentencing asserted by the defendant, and there are no special circumstances to the extent that the sentencing is modified after the fact, so the defendant's assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.