The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment, forty hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program, three years of employment restriction order, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he had the record of punishment for the same kind of force, the period of the instant crime is long, the number of crimes is high, and the victims are not agreed upon, the lower court’s sentencing appears to have been reasonably determined by fully taking into account all the circumstances, including the various grounds for sentencing asserted by the Defendant, and there are no special circumstances to the extent that the sentencing is modified ex post facto, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.