logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.09.26 2013고단1001
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendants who violate the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act are those who are engaged in the operation of Category C truck;

On March 19, 2013, the Defendant driven the above Poter truck without a driver's license on March 17:10, 2013, and led to the two-lane road in front of the distance of the Sowing-si located in Pyeongtaek-si Pung-si, Pyeongtaek-do along the two-lanes from the front side of the guest death.

Since the location was the straight line of two lanes, the defendant at the time changed the course from the two lanes to the one lane, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to make a person engaged in driving the motor vehicle to report the traffic situation of the front and rear direction well before changing the course, and to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not look at the front and rear left, and instead changed the lane at a one-lane, and received the first part of the FJ-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim D’s saved saved save in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to the foregoing occupational negligence, and at the same time, the repair cost, such as 726,966 won, was damaged to the extent that the repair cost, such as the postart exchange, was damaged.

2. No defendant who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road where he/she is not covered by mandatory insurance, as a holder of the above Poter truck;

Nevertheless, on March 19, 2013, the Defendant operated the above Poter truck which was not covered by mandatory insurance from the front day of the SK KK station in Pyeongtaek-dong to the front day of the so-called Poter-Eup Pung-si kidon-si kidon.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement 1.

arrow