logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.10.30 2012가합516667
손해배상(의)
Text

1. Defendant E Hospital, and G: (a) each of the plaintiffs A, KRW 75,827,671, and KRW 2,000,000, and KRW 1,000, respectively, to the plaintiff C and D.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff A was diagnosed as liver cell cancer at the Seoul Asan Hospital and received light chemical chronological chronology and high-frequency therapy. On February 7, 2007, the plaintiff A received transplant surgery between China's North Korean National Police Hospital.

B. On September 28, 2007, Plaintiff E Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) was inspected on the part of the BT at the Defendant E Hospital. As a result of the discovery of satisf in the lower side of the right side, Defendant F, an external medical specialist, conducted the pulmonary resuscitation and tuberculosis PC examination against Plaintiff A on November 29, 2007, and as a result of the examination, Defendant F, who was an external medical specialist, decided to diagnose and observe the non-human pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary Spe.

B. After that, on April 11, 2009, the plaintiff A received a chest CT examination at the defendant hospital, which was conducted on April 11, 2009, with a reduced size of the lower leaves on the right side, but a new waste is found at a more deep place, and the defendant F requested the plaintiff G, who is a chest X medical specialist, for a close examination.

C. On May 18, 2009, Defendant G conducted a chest CT and PET-CT test (e.g., double-explosion test) with the Plaintiff on May 18, 2009, diagnosed the Plaintiff as a pulmonary pulmonary efrition (certificate) depending on the fact that a new pulmonary efrition is deemed to be an excessive 1.7 cm, and planned pulmonary efrition against the Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

A was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on May 31, 2009, and on June 2, 2009, the Defendant F was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant F performed the instant surgery (hereinafter referred to as “instant surgery”).

However, the result of the organizational examination carried out later on the dyscoo infection, not on cancer but on chronic hyscoo infection, was proved to have been caused by Czecoo infection.

E. After the instant surgery on June 5, 2009, Plaintiff A was transferred to a middle-patient’s room as a result of the occurrence of waste collection around the new wall, and received the treatment of artificial respiratory devices and the diagnosis of the institution.

F. At present, Plaintiff A is entirely in need of the help of others in the daily life, which is the spathy, spawn, and spawn.

arrow