1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 11, 2013, Plaintiff B was diagnosed as pregnant by her husband and wife at the Defendant hospital’s hospital. On or around the 27th of the same month, Plaintiff B was diagnosed as pregnant by her husband and wife and was continuously diagnosed at the Defendant hospital.

B. During the period of pre-industrial diagnosis at the Defendant Hospital, Plaintiff B had no particular disease or result of the pre-industrial diagnosis, and Plaintiff C and D had no special error in the pre-industrial diagnosis.

C. At around 11:47-11:48, which is the 35th anniversary of pregnancy, Plaintiff C and D were netized into the king. Plaintiff C had a good condition at the time of birth, and Plaintiff C had a good condition at the time of birth, and the APAR score at the time of birth was at least 1:8, and 10 per 5 minutes after birth.

However, the plaintiff C refers to a baby whose body is less than 2500g at the time of birth with the body of birth 2.36 km.

In order to manage the baby, the hospital was hospitalized in the center for the intensive treatment of the newborn baby after birth, and there was a sporadic sporadic sporadism, but there was a view that the normal recovery was made voluntarily or simply by a simple sporadic, and since the special spodic spodic spods were not observed, the hospital discharged on January 30

E. On August 2014, Plaintiff C received a diagnosis of “cerebral cerebral Bribery” due to “cerebral Bribery” as a result of the MRI’s inspection conducted by the Synish Hospital at the Synish University (Seoul). On August 27, 2015, Plaintiff C was determined as a disability grade 1 on the cerebral Bribery.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 8, 9 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers), the result of the request for appraisal of medical records to the president of the Central University Hospital of this Court, and the president of the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion (1) the Plaintiff’s assertion that he had failed to predict or avoid the cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typhism is a low pulmonary typology, and the Plaintiff C is a low pulmonary pulmonary typology rather than a normal pulmonary typology, and this is due to this.