logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.11.14 2017고정1805
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving B Poter Cargo Vehicles.

On July 18, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 07:45, and passed the side road without the front line of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, along the intersection where traffic is not controlled in the direction of the parallel toward the long-standing, from the sloping bank.

In such cases, when a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle intends to enter the intersection at the same time with the same priority order, he/she has the duty of care to prevent accidents by concessioning the way to the right-hand side of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and is proceeding without good direction, and by failing to comply with the cross-section traffic method, the defendant is driving the victim D (43 tax, n, n) who is proceeding on the left side from the right side of the direction.

E Datch driver's seat even studio was shocked by the front driver of the Defendant vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by his occupational negligence during the two-day period of medical treatment, i.e., “s.e., s.e., s. s.s. and tension.”

B. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at the same time and place as “A” above, and at the same time and place, damaged the damaged vehicle E at a cost equivalent to KRW 1,260,730,000 in estimate of repair, such as the “after Lart set” of the damaged vehicle E by negligence.

(c)

No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant driven B Poter Cargo which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place of the above “A” clause.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A supplementary statement of D;

1. A report on the actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing insurance certificates;

1. Article 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts

arrow