logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.11.27 2014고정1428
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, around October 3, 2014, operated a car without mandatory insurance from January 2, 2014, around 07:23, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu B.

2. The defendant violates the Road Traffic Act (driving) shall have drank two degrees of illness and her degree of illness in the Sonsan-si restaurant of the members of Ansan-si, and in the Soncheon-si Soncheon-si vagane market of Son-gu, Soncheon-gu, Sonsan-si.

On October 3, 2014, the Defendant, around 07:23, driven a car with approximately 3 meters of alcohol level C while under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.241% on the front of Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu B at approximately 07:23.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the response statutes to requests for information on detection of drivers, investigation reports, and inquiry into facts (whether to purchase mandatory insurance);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation, Articles 46 (2) 2, 8, 148-2 (2) 1, and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In full view of all kinds of sentencing conditions including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, circumstances after the crime, etc., including the short distance from the Defendant’s driving of the Defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order and the difficulty in the Defendant’s assumptive sentence, etc.

arrow