logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1987. 3. 25.자 87마240 결정
[등기공무원처분에대한이의][공1987.7.15.(804),1042]
Main Issues

Where registration has been made upon an application for registration to be rejected, the method of extinguishment thereof.

Summary of Decision

Where the application for registration falls under the category of "where the document required for the application is not appended" as provided in subparagraph 8 of Article 55 of the Registration of Real Estate Act, the registrar shall dismiss the application for registration, but once the registrar completes the registration in accordance with such application, the registrar may only request the cancellation of the registration as the principal lawsuit for the registration, and may not seek the cancellation by the method of filing an objection against the disposition by the registrar, if the interested party on

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 55 and 178 of the Registration of Real Estate Act

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Order 70Ma738 Dated August 29, 1973 73Ma669 Dated August 29, 1973

Re-appellant

Re-appellant

The order of the court below

Seoul Central District Court Order 86Ra616 Dated February 16, 1987

Text

The reappeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of reappeal are examined.

Examining the order of the court below in comparison with the records, since the application for registration of this case constitutes "when documents necessary for the application have not been attached" as stipulated in Article 55 subparagraph 8 of the Registration of Real Estate Act, a registrar shall reject the application for registration. However, once a registrar completes registration in accordance with the application for registration and the registration has become interested parties in the form stated in the registry, he can only file a claim for cancellation as a principal lawsuit against the registration, and cannot file a claim for cancellation by the method of objection against the disposition of the registrar, it is just and justified to dismiss the appeal against the application of this case, and there is no ground to appeal

Therefore, the reappeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.

Justices Lee B-soo (Presiding Justice)

arrow