1. The Plaintiff: (a) put 1,101 square meters in Daegu-gun, into an auction; and (b) deducts the auction cost from the price.

1. The facts following the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be found in full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5 and Eul evidence Nos. 2 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the results of the request for the measurement and appraisal to the branch offices achieved by the Korea Land Information Corporation in this Court, the results of the on-site verification by this Court, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

The plaintiff 190

4. 14. D’s heir, E, F, etc. received a donation of the instant land’s share and completed the registration of ownership transfer, and purchased shares of G 111/33 on July 12, 2006 at the auction procedure and is currently entitled to share of 166/33 of the instant land.

B. On April 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) donated shares of 111/33 out of the instant land from Ma-do H; and (b) completed the registration of ownership transfer; and (c) purchased shares of 56/33 out of the instant land from I on August 25, 2015, and completed the registration of ownership transfer by purchasing shares of

At present, the defendant is a right holder of 167/33 of the land of this case.

C. The part of the context of the headquarters is adjacent to the area between the Plaintiff and the JJ 212 square meters owned by the Plaintiff. The part of the headquarters is adjacent to the area where the Defendant acquired ownership on November 27, 2015.

㉠부분 중 ㉣부분에는 피고의 부친의 분묘가 있고, ㉤부분은 묘지로 조성되어 있다.

E. The Judgment of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the instant house”) refers to the Plaintiff’s residence in light of the following: (a) lightweight structure and other roof detached houses of 49.5 square meters (hereinafter “instant house”) around 2014; (b) and (c) KK in the Daegu-si, Daegu-do adjacent thereto are used as the Mara and parking lot in which the Defendant is the Do governor.

2. Summary of both claims;

가. 원고의 주장 원고와 피고는 이 사건 토지를, ㉠부분은 원고 소유로, ㉡, ㉢부분은 피고 소유로 분할하기로 합의하였고, 피고는 원고에게 ㉣부분의 분묘를 굴이해 주기로 약정하였으며, 피고는 ㉡부분에 이 사건 주택을 신축하여 점유하였다.

On July 9, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant on the premise of the agreement on partition of co-owned property.