logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2015.10.30 2015허260
거절결정(실)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) The name of the device in this case (No. 3 evidence 1): B/D3; the applicant: Plaintiff 4) claims (amended by September 24, 2013) 【W 1”; the body of the hackter (Do 1-1); the back of the hackd body shall be vertical length; the front side of the hackd body shall be 50 square meters; the hack of the hackd body shall be 6 degrees in the shape of the hackter; the hackd body shall be 9 degrees in front of the hackd body; the hacked body shall be 5 degrees in front of the hackd body; the hack of the hackd body shall be 9 degrees in front of the hackd body (hereinafter referred to as the “hackd body”) and shall be 1 hackd in front of the hackd body (hereinafter referred to as the “hacking body”).

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

In the Si, there is only claim 10,00,00 claims in the case of the instant petition for a golf wave in the structure that controls the efforts to raise the Hague and promotes the function to lower down (hereinafter “Composition 3”), and therefore, “the instant petition for a patent” refers to the claim 1 in the instant petition for a patent.

(v) The main contents and main drawings of the Explanation of the Bill: [Attachment 1].

B. Compared 1) Alternative Reference 1 (No. 3 No. 2009, Jan. 19, 2009)

arrow