Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On July 2019, the Defendant: (a) at the beauty shop operated by G in Daegu Suwon-gu, 2019, at the beauty shop operated by C; (b) in which D and E are customers, etc., the Defendant had been heard, and (c) had been employed by C, the victim F, the business owner of which was the Defendant, “F is now in the state where the new Tran has overf, and the family register has not been arranged; and (d) now, the Defendant f is going together with the birth of the new Tran.
It seems that the Shin Franc exceeded the crypt, but seems to have returned to the money.
The production of a pether has resulted in the use of a flag to escape from his/her identity.
“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention (Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act);
B. On December 28, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, the victim's non-won statement was submitted.
C. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act)