The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was aware of the victim C’s four residents, such as the victim C, and the victim was married with the spouse D before 28 years and brought about E while living together with the victim, and there was no other fact of marriage or wind with the other male.

On February 2, 2015, the Defendant, at the restaurant operated by G in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul on February 2015, 2015, posted a victim to G while referring to the victim, thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts. The Defendant, at the early February 2015, damaged the victim by publicly pointing out false facts.

B. From March 2015, the Defendant of defamation, among the police officers, damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts. In March 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (a) referred the victim to H in terms of “The same as that of the No.S.; and (b) referred to as “A.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. I.S. am. I.S. I.).”

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

On November 14, 2016, after the prosecution of this case, the victim expressed his intention that he does not want the punishment of the defendant.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.