logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.09.06 2013노1617
모욕
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not make the victim F a statement, such as a woman who has no husband, as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment below, and there is no fact that the Defendant made the victim’s statement with the intent to insult the victim.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, F and C together with the defendant at the time and place indicated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below, are consistent from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, and the defendant stated, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below, that "F told her husband that she left her office and left her seat with her husband, and that she is a woman who does not have her husband," and there is no material to doubt the credibility of the above statement, and G transferred from the defendant with regard to this case, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below, it is true that the defendant stated that "F was a woman who does not have her seat with her husband," and that "It is sufficient to recognize that she would have fallen her husband's social seat with her husband and her husband's seat with her husband, and that it constitutes a woman's seat with her husband," as stated in the facts in the judgment of the court below.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.

arrow