1. The Defendant’s disposition to reduce the number of students in 2015 against the Plaintiff on August 26, 2014 shall be revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. A. 1) The Defendant conducted an audit on the Plaintiff and B University established and operated by the Plaintiff between August 28, 2006 and September 8, 2006 (hereinafter “the auditor of 2006”).

(2) On November 14, 2006, the Plaintiff notified the Plaintiff of the result of the audit as indicated in the disposition of the audit results in attached Form 1206, and ordered the Defendant to submit a performance report by January 14, 201 to the Defendant from November 14, 201 to November 30, 201 (hereinafter “201 Auditor”), and on February 29, 2012, the Defendant submitted a comprehensive audit report to the Plaintiff on the Plaintiff and the pertinent universities (hereinafter “201 Auditor”), including the “acquisition and operation of fundamental property for education” written in the audit results in attached Form 22011, stating the Plaintiff’s status measures (as to the 12 pointed out as indicated in the disposition of the audit results in attached Form 12, including the “acquisition and operation of fundamental property for education, etc.”), administrative measures (as to heavy disciplinary actions, warning 14), administrative measures (as to 20), five administrative measures (as to the notification), and the result of the implementation report to the Defendant.

B. The result of the reduction in the number of students and the administrative litigation in 2014) the Plaintiff failed to comply with each of the above audit results. On February 25, 2013, the Defendant ordered correction of the non-performance of the audit results in 2006 [the correction: approximately KRW 700 million preservation measures, etc. for the basic property for profit (the amount held at the time of establishment) disposed of without permission from the competent agency], and issued an order to correct the non-performance of the audit results in April 18, 2013. On April 30, 2013, the Plaintiff issued an order to correct the non-performance of the audit results in 201. The Plaintiff’s order to the Defendant on April 30, 2013 as to the non-performance of the measures to preserve the basic property for profit under the audit results for 206

Along with the fact that the corporation established the corporation and used it as its fundamental property, and that the corporation completed disciplinary proceedings on the non-performance of its status measures in the audit results in 2011.