logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.07.27 2018고단1782
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 1,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On February 24, 2018, Defendant A, at around 16:00, installed 43 game instruments in the game room without the trade name of the second floor in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu (Seoul) and 2nd floor in the game without being classified by the Committee on Water Management. Defendant A, who found the place, charged 100,000 won for the game machine to 17 persons, such as customers D, and charged 100,000 won for the game machine, and carried out the game by making the points according to the arrangement of the pictures or numbers displayed on the game machine screen or lost the points. Defendant A, who acquired the points obtained by customers as a result of the game machine, exchanged them in cash without a fee in cases where the points obtained are more than the first filled point by converting the points into one won per point, and then deducted the points under the name of 50,000 won from a fee by 10% or more, and then made a business to exchange them in cash.

As a result, the defendant is engaged in speculative activities using speculative electronic machines, provides game water that has not been rated by a meeting of the game water rating members, and exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

2. Defendant B, as an employee of the above game room for the operation of the above A, was an employee of the game room for the operation of the illegal game room in the same manner as that of the above paragraph (1) at the same time as that of the above paragraph (1), on condition that the above A received KRW 80,00 won per day from the above A, the customer opened the door of the game room, and the customer was in the heart of the customer.

As a result, the Defendant, in the above manner, carried on speculative acts using speculative electronic machines, provided game water that was not classified as a class, and provided it to exchange tangible and intangible results acquired thereby, and prevented the Defendant from doing so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Game;

arrow