The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 22, 2017, among health examinations conducted by the National Health Insurance Corporation, the Plaintiff was recommended to examine and treat the third hospital since it is likely that the Plaintiff may increase the right side of the new book from the above member’s doctor, as a result of the TT examination conducted by the Daegu Suwon-gu Incheon Metropolitan Medical Center E.

Accordingly, on December 22, 2017, the Plaintiff received a written request for medical treatment stating that “I will request the above-mentioned medical treatment for the cultivation of life expectancy, the right, and the disease.”

B. (1) On December 22, 2017, the Plaintiff is Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”).

) G Hospital operated by the G Hospital (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Hospital”);

2) On December 22, 2017, the medical doctor of the film department of the Defendant hospital confirmed the Plaintiff’s above-mentioned CT image, and then confirmed the 3.5 cm size attached to the new book on the right side, and presented his opinion that the 3.5 cm size accompanied by the rheination is consistent with the raid cancer.

On December 29, 2017, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed that there is no evidence of transfer by examining the bones cans for the purpose of examining blood, etc. on the Plaintiff on December 29, 2017, and examining whether the kid cancer was transferred to other organs, boness, etc. on January 4, 2018, and determined that it is appropriate to extend the part for the Plaintiff’s kid cancer treatment.

Accordingly, on January 27, 2018, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital in order to undergo a kidne dynasium.

On January 28, 2018, the next day, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed that there was a negative opinion of 3.5cm in size at the kidne. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital, such as the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital C, etc. conducted an kidne dysing kidy on the right side of the Plaintiff on January 29, 2018.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital determined to perform the refratal refrative refrative refrigeration by changing the range of surgery while performing the refratal refrative surgery to the Plaintiff, and explained the situation to the Plaintiff’s father and wife waiting outside the operating room, and then, given the Plaintiff’s refratal refrative refrigeration (hereinafter “the instant surgery”).