1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months;

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On April 26, 2017, Defendant B was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud and two years of suspended execution at the Daejeon District Court, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on May 5, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendants’ co-crimes (Attempted Fraud) intend to introduce jobs to women before and after the beginning of the 20th century, which lack social experience through the instant Messenger, as the region’s post-line distribution relationship.

If a loan is granted after access, it shall be paid a daily amount.

The author tried to acquire the loan by fraud after making the loan application in his name while making a false statement.

Defendant

A, around December 26, 2017, via the PP PC in the off-to-face PC room of Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, China-ri Dong, and the off-to-face 100,000 won per day, would introduce the call center short-term part-to-face 1,000 won for the call center providing a simple telephone response service.

The term “E” refers to “E” and “E”, and the Defendant B proposed to be defective in committing the crime as above, as the case was discussed by the Defendant B, and the Defendant B consented.

On December 27, 2017, the Defendants listened to the statements that they may take jobs from the said E and E at the G convenience store, and met the victim H (e.g., 24 years of age, intellectual disability 3 level). Defendant B is isolated from the victim “Jel” located in the Si I like E, and Defendant A is isolated from the victim “Lel” located in the Si I, and Defendant A would take back the victim to the “Lel” located in the Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and introduce the victim to the “Lel,” and would pay KRW 10,000 won per day after the date, and if so, the lending company should obtain approval for the loan of KRW 5 million in the name of four.

‘A false statement' was made.

However, even if the Defendants received a loan under the name of the victim, they not only did they have no intention or ability to repay the loan, but also planned to use the loan individually by obtaining a loan from the injured party.