logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.21 2014가합571606
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. As to KRW 257,861,532 out of the amount of KRW 1,147,092,637 and the above amount:

(b) the defendant.

Reasons

1. On December 27, 1995, Hanil Bank Co., Ltd.: ① 150,000,000 won on December 1995; ② on January 19, 1996, Defendant B and C loaned 194,467,000 won on the joint and several surety (each guarantee limit of KRW 260,000,000, and KRW 910,000) of Defendant B’s joint and several surety (Guarantee limit of KRW 65,00,000 on September 7, 1996) under the Defendant B’s joint and several surety (Guarantee Limit of KRW 65,000,000 on September 8, 1997) under the Defendant B’s joint and several surety (Guarantee Limit of KRW 65,000,000 on September 9, 1998.

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants on June 4, 2004 with the amount of KRW 651,806,978 and KRW 252,839,00 among the above amounts, the amount of KRW 19% per annum from May 18, 2004 to July 14, 2004; KRW 20% per annum from May 18, 2004 to July 14, 2004; KRW 20% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment; KRW 20% per annum from the 205th day to the date of full payment; KRW 325,00,000 among the above amounts; and KRW 40 to the date of full payment; and KRW 204.4% per annum from the above amount to the date of full payment; and KRW 325,000,000 per annum from 20 to 304.5% per annum from the above amount to the date of full payment.

(Seoul Central District Court Decision 2004Gahap42673 delivered on December 3, 2004). In September 30, 2014, the Defendants’ obligations against the Plaintiff as of September 30, 2014 are as follows, and the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit for the interruption of extinctive prescription.

(1) The loan 179,46,456,58888,82,82, 108,327,427,40, 179,40,423,890,403,890,400,390, 26,932,000, 815, 82108, 1082, 327,882, 311, 116, 098, 13, 556, 13, 13, 56, etc. of the loan.

arrow