logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.12 2014가단5083183
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant Hoi Construction contracted the construction of new rental buildings in the internal city located in Hong-gun Hong-gun, Hong-gun, Hong-gun, Hong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Hong-gun, and subcontracted to C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”).

B. During the foregoing construction work, C leased E Trares (hereinafter “Defendant cres”) and news F from D (D leased and sub-leaseed Defendant cres, and Defendant Samsung Fire concluded an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to G and Defendant cres), and leased the launch machine and the Plaintiff from H, and the period from April 18, 2013 to April 18, 2013 with the employment contract signed by the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on April 2013.

4. up to 30.30. The daily allowance was 2.50,000 won, and the plaintiff actually during the above period.

4.18.18.

4.19.

4. 30. 30. 3 Work and received 7.50,000 won as labor cost;

C. In order to detect the sn beam, the sn beam is a dangerous work because it connects the sn beam to the sn beam to the sn beams, and if the sniffs to the sniffs to the sniffs the sniffs to the sniffs, to extract the sniffs to the sniffs, and if the sniffs to the sniffs to the sciffs to the sciffs at high places.

At the above construction site, the temporary fence was installed, and F was located outside the temporary fence, and F was located outside the 50 tons of Defendant cick (if the temporary fence was installed higher than the Defendant cick's driver's seat and it is difficult for F to see the construction site), operated Defendant cick under the direction of work with no electricity from the inside director of C in the temporary fence, and the Plaintiff operated cick in the temporary fence.

Around 13:10 on April 30, 2013, while conducting the above human launch work, approximately three tons of the hydrotensions connected to the Defendant Cricker, caused an accident where the hydrotensions between the Defendant Cricker and the hydrotensions between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Cricker, and the hydrotensions between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Cricker.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disaster”). (e)

(e).

arrow