logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2021.02.02 2020고단3874
업무상과실치사
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person engaged in the removal and dismantling of a building, etc. under the trade name of “C”, and Defendant A is a person engaged in the operation and driving of a camera at a mutual company of “D”.

Defendant

B On February 2020, after receiving a request from the K-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City F Co., Ltd. to remove the head of the Hostst, which is established in the company's factory located in the K-gu Kimhae-si, the company will proceed together with the above work under the conditions that the victim G ( South and North 69 years old) and the profits are divided in half, and the defendant A was to be used in the above work at the request of the defendant B, and to be in charge of the operation and driving of the Kast

The above work is the work of string string strings installed in the factory upper part to raise the string strings to the floor after raising the strings. The strings were installed to move the strings to the left and right by the strings depending on the strings. During the increase work, when the strings move to the upper part of the factory, there was a risk of extinguishing the strings from the string level because the strings move to one by strings.

Therefore, the Defendants had a duty of care to prevent the string of the strings from spreading off the strings by checking whether the strings have been fixed prior to the increase work, preventing the strings from being changed in weight during the work, raising the string strings by using the strings of the upper group of the strings, or concluding the string labels using the show strings.

Nevertheless, at around 17:40 on February 22, 2020, the Defendants did not confirm whether the list was fixed in breach of the duty of care as above at the above work site, and did not use the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the top of the third of the top of the top of the second of the top of the third of the top of the third of the top of the third of the third of the top of

arrow