logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.12.07 2017고단1445
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants were residing together in the Defendant A’s residence in Pyeongtaek-si C and 501 from around 2016 to February 2, 2017.

1. On February 14, 2017, at around 10:59, Defendant A sent a written message stating that “If he/she lends a e-mail card for three days, he/she will give 700,000 won per 1 e-mail card” from a person who was in the name of the above Defendant’s residence, Defendant A sent the e-mail card between February 15, 2017 and February 21, 2017, Defendant A sent the e-mail card (D) and e-mail card (E) among the Nonghyup Bank from around February 15, 2017 to around February 21, 2017, Defendant A provided Kwikset Service employees with a Kakao x.

As a result, the defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the approaching media.

2. On February 14, 2017, the Defendants’ joint crime Defendant B heard that he received text messages from Defendant A with the above contents at the Defendant’s residence, and the Defendants conspired with Defendant B’s physical check with Defendant A’s physical check. The Defendants also conspired Defendant B’s name with Defendant A’s physical check.

Defendant

B From February 15, 2017 to February 21, 2017, the Nong Bank (F) sent to Defendant A a Kakaoxa, and Defendant A sent this account’s password to Kwikset service employees, and notified Defendant A of this account’s secret number as Kakaox.

As a result, the Defendants agreed to receive the price in collusion and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A H statement;

1. Details of entry and withdrawal transactions, response to each financial information, CCTV withdrawals, copies of bankbooks, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on verification certificates;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provision pertaining to the facts constituting an offense: Articles 49(4)2 and 6(3)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (choice of penalty) of the same Act; Articles 49(4)2 and 6(3)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act (elective of penalty)

arrow