1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The relation 1) The Plaintiff is the Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) on July 1, 1998.

(2) Defendant C was the representative director of the Defendant Company at the time of such removal and reduction of salary, and Defendant C was the chairman of the Defendant Company’s ethical management office, Defendant F was the director of the Defendant Company’s I Trade Union (hereinafter “trade union”), Defendant F was the director of the Defendant Company’s ethical management office, the director of the auditor of the Defendant Company’s ethical management office, Defendant G was the director of the auditor of the Defendant Company’s ethical management office, and Defendant H was the director of the global headquarters of the Defendant Company.

B. From February 12013, a press report was continued to the effect that “the Defendant Company shall grant preferential treatment to a particular business entity in relation to the J hotel services” from the date of commencing the audit of the Plaintiff of the Defendant Company and removal from the position of this case.

Accordingly, the defendant company thought that the internal employees illegally leaked the company's confidential documents and spread the above questions. On October 28 of the same year, the defendant company established a "Plan for Security Examinations of Main History" and conducted security examinations. The same year is applicable.

4. From October 16 to October 15, 201 of the same year, the Defendant acquired and analyzed “the file list at which document cam was cancelled for six months” and “the file list at which document cam was cancelled from October 16, 2012 to April 15, 2013.” The Defendant Company additionally obtained and analyzed “the file list at which document cam was cancelled” around October 16, 2012 and “the files list at which document cam was removed. 2) around January 26, 2014, the Defendant Company had access to the integrated financial system of the Defendant Company by using the ID and password of L’s staff member of the global headquarters of the Defendant Company’s global headquarters, and (i) had access to the consolidated financial system of the Defendant Company using the ID and password of L, and (ii) had relation to the subsidiary director related to real estate business, and (iii) had relation to the agreement and the payment details of consulting services related to the G hotel business/service” (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant data”).

Dar. Round.