beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are all dismissed.
2. After an appeal is filed.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows. The plaintiff’s explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except as stated in Paragraph 2, with regard to the claim for damages, which was added as preliminaryly in the court of first instance. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Part 3 of the Judgment of the first instance court, "The entries and specifications of Evidence A 1, 5 through 8, Eul 2, 5 through 7 shall be taken into consideration as "the respective entries of Evidence A 1, 4 through 8, Eul 2, and 5 through 7, part of Evidence A 13, and witness E in part and testimony of the party at the end of 5 at the end of 11, and "the above fact-finding is insufficient to be taken into consideration," respectively, and part of Evidence A 13, and some testimony of the above E shall be added at the end of 5 at the same time."
From the 3rd bottom to the 20th 2nd 201, the 2nd 2nd 201 up to the 20th 201 up to the 3rd 201 up to the 20th 20th 201, the 4th 4th 200 up to the following grounds:
(v) Article 5 of the instant lease agreement (No. 1, No. 2) provides that “The method of payment of the price shall be paid based on on on on the on-site nature.”
On the other hand, Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. concluded a contract performance guarantee insurance contract with the Defendant on the instant construction subcontracted by the Defendant from Shee Construction and the Sungsung Es Newly constructed Corporation located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu as the insured for Scar Construction, and paid the insurance money to Shee Construction, and filed a claim for reimbursement against the Defendant and the joint guarantor of the indemnity liability (Seoul Central District Court 201Gahap98407). The written complaint states that the Defendant failed to perform the above construction from May 201 to June 21, 201, and that the insurance accident occurred on June 21, 2011.
Considering these circumstances, the Plaintiff and the Defendant around June 201.