All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. According to the statements, etc. made by I of misunderstanding of facts by the Defendants at the investigative agency, the court below held that Defendant B did not have committed an injury on the part of the victim, and there was an error of misunderstanding of facts in the judgment of the court below.

B. The lower court’s sentence (two million won of a fine) against Defendant A on the grounds that the Defendant’s punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

2. Determination

A. The lower court found the Defendants not guilty on the grounds that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as the victim’s statement in the investigative agency and the court of the lower court, and the victim’s statement in the investigation agency and the I’s statement in the investigation agency, cannot be trusted as it is, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as the victim’s death diagnosis, is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants jointly committed an injury requiring about four weeks’ medical treatment, and there

In the following circumstances, the court below and the court below stated in the circumstances as follows, i.e., (i) the victim's daily activity at the scene of the court below and the trial court lawfully adopted and investigated: (ii) at the court of the trial court, the investigative agency stated that "at the time when the victim went to the stairs, leaving the victim to the middle of the stairs, and two persons went to the middle of the stairs, and the victim went to the bar, and then the victim got out of the bar." While the light was reported and sound, the two male persons led the victim and her second male life moved to the outside. However, the victim was found to have been able to look after the victim. However, the employee of the "F" club at the court of the court of the trial at the time of the case, and the defendant 1 and the defendant 1 were tried to see that the defendant 1 were able to go to the middle of the bar at the time of the case.