logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.11.07 2019가합25565
채무부존재확인
Text

1. With respect to the accidents described in attached Form 2, the plaintiff against the defendant based on each insurance contract listed in attached Form 1.

Reasons

1. Although the deceased, who is the insured of each insurance contract under the separate sheet No. 1 entered into between the Plaintiff and the deceased C, died due to an accident described in the separate sheet No. 2 during each insurance period, there was no proof that the above accident was an accident. Rather, in light of the circumstances of the accident, it constitutes an accident by the deceased’s intentional act and constitutes an accident by the deceased’s intentional act, and thus falls under the grounds for exemption under the Commercial Act and the terms

Nevertheless, the defendant claims for the payment of injury, death, etc. based on each of the above insurance contracts against the plaintiff. Therefore, it is necessary to confirm the non-existence of the insurance claim.

2. Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;

arrow