A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 3, 2015, at around 02:56, the Defendant: (a) was trying to neglect safety regulations and to take a position while drinking alcohol in C Sariro located in the first floor of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B; (b) had the victim D, who is an employee, take a bath and sound, thereby hindering the victim’s friendship or business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 14 minutes.

2. When the Defendant received a warning to the effect that he would be in danger of her entering a breath in a state of drinking from F of the Seoul Guro Police Station E District, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the maintenance of order by assaulting, such as “I am breath, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, I am blish, I am am blish, I am blish, and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement of D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV image data;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation as to the crime of the obstruction of performance of official duties] The scope of the final sentencing due to the aggravation that there is no basic area (6 months to 1 year and 4 months) of the first category of the obstruction of official duties (special person): the sentencing criteria is not applied since the former concurrent crimes of Article 37 of the Criminal Act between the crime of the obstruction of performance of official duties for which the sentencing guidelines are set and the crime of the obstruction of official duties not set up, and the lower limit is based on the lower limit of the sentencing guidelines as to the crime of the obstruction of official duties [the decision of the sentence], the defendant is divided into and against his mistake, and the defendant is two times every different crimes