logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.07.27 2018고단995
특수협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

At around 01:10 on March 15, 2018, the Defendant was married in the Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D2, and the “E Public Notice Telecom” 21 on which he resides, and the victim C was found to have been able to bring about her diving, and opened a door, door, door, and door.

In addition, from the victim C, the Defendant “Is the grix?? Is the grix?????????????

By the way, he also avoided the phone call, so far as you wanted to listen to the word of "," and made it possible to see the kitchen, which is a dangerous object of 15 cm in the length of the blade and 28 cm in the length of the knife, and the kitchen knife, which is a dangerous object of 15 cm in the chnife of the kitchen, and 28 cm in the length of the knife, the victim C by the knife, and the victim C by the knife, and threatened the victim C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283(1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act include the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, the fact that the defendant did not agree with the victim, the fact that the defendant reflects the defendant's mistake, and the prosecution's opinion on the prosecution's punishment shall be determined as the same as the disposition, in consideration of the

arrow