A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The Defendant at around 19:50 on September 10, 2018, under the “D Public Notice Telecom” managed by the Victim C (Y, 39 years of age) in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and 2, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the Defendant’s payment to the residents of the above public notice telecom; and (b) made the victim’s resistance with respect to non-verification of the user fee of the publicly notified telecom.

The death shall be discarded.

1.5 Doesctrine, “Years,” and “The Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, and Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, and Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, and Doctrine, Doctrine, Doctrine, and Doctrine, were

In this respect, the defendant carried a dangerous article and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. 112 Declarations;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the types of decisions] : The scope of the recommended punishment [the range of the recommended punishment], the group of violent crimes, intimidation, the fourth type (special intimidation) [the person subject to special sentencing], and the factors of aggravation and mitigation: None of them [the scope of the recommended punishment]: April to June; and

2. Determination of sentence [unfair circumstances] The Defendant threatened the victim, who is the owner of the youth where the Defendant had been residing in an excessive manner while under the influence of alcohol, while in possession of a dangerous object. In light of the content of the crime and the method of the crime, the liability for the crime was not less and less severe in light of the content of the crime and the method of the crime, and re-offending the record of criminal punishment several times, which did not receive a letter from