The judgment of the first instance is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) made a confession that the defendant sent the victim C text messages No. 1 through No. 3 of the year indicated in the list of crimes in the annexed sheet, and the remaining text messages No. 4 through 9 are sufficiently proved according to the evidence, but the court of first instance that acquitted the defendant, unlike this, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts.

2. According to the records on the attached list Nos. 1 through 3, the first instance court's determination that the Defendant's act of transmitting text messages Nos. 1 through 3 (hereinafter simply referred to as simple text messages) to the victim C on the grounds as stated in its reasoning is not sufficient to recognize the Defendant's act of creating a series of repeated apprehensions as stipulated in Article 74 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., is just and reasonable. Thus, the first instance court's determination on this part is erroneous in the misconception of facts, and the prosecutor's assertion on this is without merit.

3. Determination on the attached list Nos. 4 through 9

가. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2012. 6. 7. 08:57경 전주 이하 불상지에서, 피고인 명의의 휴대폰 등을 이용하여 피해자 C의 휴대폰으로 ”나이 값 좀 해 십 븅신아 ㅎㅎ 페이스북에 보지년들처럼 경고 남기면서 쎈 척하다 쫄려서 차단 먹임 “이라는 내용의 문자메시지를 보낸 것을 포함하여 같은 날 10:48경까지 별지 범죄일람표 연번 4 내지 9 각 기재와 같이 총 6회에 걸쳐 정보통신망을 통하여 공포심이나 불안감을 유발하는 문언을 반복적으로 피해자에게 도달하게 하였다.

B. The first instance judgment of the first instance is insufficient to recognize that the defendant sent this part of the facts charged because the defendant denied the dispatch and the actual phone number was not verified.