1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 27,181,040 won and each year from July 4, 2012 to October 4, 2012.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 19:45 on August 2, 201, Defendant A, who was only liable for liability insurance, driven the Defendant’s Lone Star Vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicles”), and followed the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle’s front right-hand side of the vehicle, which was directly driven on the right-hand side of the instant two-lane road, into the intersection at the right-hand left-hand side of the front side of the instant two-lane convenience store in front of the instant two-lane bus bus terminal at the right-hand side of the instant two-lane road. In short, Defendant A, at the right-hand left-hand side of the instant two-lane road, had the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was directly driven on the first line of the said direction, and the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle, which entered into an integrated vehicle insurance with the Plaintiff, as the left-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”. (b)

E was treated by suffering from injury of brain-dead, light salvinitis, salvinitis, salvinal, and both sides of the instant accident, due to the shock of the head of the instant accident.

C. The Defendant vehicle is only liable for liability insurance, and E claimed insurance money from the Plaintiff in accordance with the terms and conditions of the automobile accident insurance policy for the general motor vehicle insurance, and received payment from the Plaintiff by July 3, 2012 (i.e., consolation money of KRW 11,025,025,000, KRW 56,456,040, and KRW 57,000, KRW 168,337, 500 x 50% x 96.6849 x 70% of negligence).

On August 2, 2012, the Plaintiff returned KRW 4 million from the Eastern Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., the insurer of liability insurance purchased on the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, Gap evidence Nos. 7-1, 2, 3, 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of claims for indemnity;

A. (1) According to the above fact of recognition, the accident of this case is one of the same direction while driving the defendant vehicle which was stopped in front of the right-hand convenience point of the road and attempting to turn to the left at a two-lane road.