Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a resident of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment house with a dispute with the victim D in relation to various problems in Bupyeong apartment.

around 13:00 on March 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) from the person who was organized in the foregoing apartment complex, the victim D, a resident of the foregoing apartment complex, was requested to have an interview related to the assault case, such as attaching a f’s f’s sat, which is an apartment management warden, by hand around 10:34 on February 19, 2016; and (b) the Defendant responded to the request for an interview related to the assault case, and (c) appears to have f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s fat at the above reporter. It is a video. It is very very rough, that the Defendant f’s fat at the hospital now.

“The above interview was reported to the said broadcast news on the day.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each investigation report (the CCTV closure attached to the management office, the closure of articles constituting the criminal facts of A of a suspect, the confirmation and copy of CD data submitted by a complainant, and the attachment of CCTV image-cap data) / [The defendant and his/her defense counsel, although the defendant and his/her defense counsel have made a statement identical to the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the defendant, they did not clearly state any specific part, and the victim had already talked about such contents in an open manner, and thus the above statement has damaged the reputation of the victim.

Although the above statement cannot be seen to the effect that it solely pertains to the public interest as true facts, the contents of the statement are sufficiently specified in light of the overall contents of the news report in question, the circumstances at the time of interview by the defendant, etc., which can be seen by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, and the contents of the statement are deemed to be harmful to the reputation of the victim. The victim made the statement to the effect that it was made by himself.

8.2