The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant in front of the Songpa-gu Seoul apartment apartment center around December 2, 2015, and the fact that the Defendant did not bring one copy of the kimchi in the center for senior citizens of the victim D, despite the fact that he did not bring about one copy of the kimchi in the center for senior citizens. In the absence of the fact that 20 members of the center for senior citizens are heard by the victim, “I am a kimchi through a

The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false information, “n't have been salved and has been at the same time.”

2. The Defendant alleged that he did not speak as stated in the facts charged, and even if so, the Defendant made such remarks.

Even if the honor of the victim was damaged,

It is difficult to see it.

3. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the prosecutor’s judgment and the submission of the Defendant, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor is insufficient to find the Defendant guilty of the charges, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the charges.

A. The facts charged are as follows: “I am the defendant walk and balk Kimchi in the middle;

N. At the time of the statement “I.D.” (hereinafter “the instant statement”), 20 members of the center for senior citizens were heard around the center at the time of the statement.

However, the witness D, E, and F stated “The Defendant made the instant statement in the form of D, E, and G (E).

In the last place where the members of the center for senior citizens were in the heart, the defendant was killed in his/her own kimchi as a kimchi dynas.

The statement was made to the effect that it was “(F)” (F took place a debate about CCTV-related disputes and the Defendant’s instant remarks at the time of drinking around 12:00.

However, this is inconsistent with D, E’s statement to the effect that the Defendant made the instant speech at 2 p.m. b. A witness (except E) who signed a written confirmation submitted by the prosecutor to the effect that the Defendant took the instant speech at 2 p.m. is not directly made from the Defendant at the time of the Defendant’s testimony, even by testimony of E, D, and F, not from D, E.