logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.01.31 2017고단169
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2014, the Defendant was entitled to operate a restaurant in the victim E's house located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu Da, providing the victim with meals exclusively at the new construction site of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment, and there is a lack of KRW 30 million.

In addition, in order to operate a restaurant in a stable manner, net profit of at least KRW 20 million is generated monthly, and when investing KRW 30,000,000, the principal will be returned once more than six months, and the completion of the apartment shall be extended up to two years, from the time of lending money to the time of completion of the apartment construction to the time of completion of the apartment construction, 2,00,000,000 won, which is 10% of the proceeds of the restaurant every month.

“The purpose of this is to make a false statement.”

However, on November 2013, the Defendant paid a total of KRW 123 million from November 1, 2013 to April 29, 2014, but failed to conduct any business thereafter. Furthermore, the Defendant appeared to have been present at the delivery of meals to another restaurant within the construction site around July 2014, and around October 10 of the same year, the Defendant was unable to install a restaurant at the construction site originally promised by the said H until the end that it was impossible to install the restaurant at the construction site, and the Defendant was preparing for operation of the restaurant outside the construction site, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that he was unable to operate the restaurant at the 0th operating site of the above construction site, and the Defendant was unable to operate the restaurant at the 0th operating site of the above 0th operating site of the 0th operating site of the 0th operating site of the 0th operating site of the 0th operating site of the 0th operating site of the 0th operating site of the 0th operating site of the 0th operating site of the 20th.

arrow