beta
Cases
2013Do7359 A. Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act
(b) Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes;
Defendant
A person shall be appointed.
Appellant
Defendant
Defense Counsel
Law Firm B
Attorney C
Law Firm AB
Attorney AC, AD, AE, AF
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2012No3874 Decided June 7, 2013
Imposition of Judgment
October 11, 2013
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the relevant legal doctrine and the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found all of the facts charged in the instant case guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.
As alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (received as good offices)
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Kim Shin-chul
Justices Min Il-young
Justices Lee In-bok et al.
Justices Park Young-young