logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.03.13 2017나2030697
소유권이전등기 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance is presented to this court.

Accordingly, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, since it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition as follows, it refers to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

(However, the part concerning the assertion and determination of H and C Codefendant, Ltd., Ltd., the separate and final judgment of the court of first instance is excluded). 2.

A. The third party 11 of the judgment of the first instance is dismissed “Defendant B” as “Defendant B (hereinafter “the deceased”) prior to the filing of the lawsuit,” and all “Defendant B” as “the network.”

B. The third 16th 16th am in the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as “C” and all “Defendant C” are dismissed as “C”.

C. The fifth and sixth parallel of the first instance judgment “N” is raised to “Defendant N”.

The two to seven parallels at the sixth bottom of the judgment of the first instance shall be deleted, and the following shall be added to the part:

“F. The real estate indicated in [Attachment 1] List 3,967 square meters in Jin-si, Pakistan-si, a real estate indicated in attached Table 1 List 1, was divided and land category was changed into each real estate listed in attached Table 1 through 4 around June 7, 2015 (hereinafter “each real estate of this case”).

(g) The Deceased died on May 15, 2018, and Defendant N, who was a sole inheritor, took over the instant legal proceedings.

E. Five (7) pages of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: “A evidence 15 to 21” means “A evidence 15 to 21, 69-1 to 5”.

F. The 7th 5th eth son of the first instance judgment “this Court” is regarded as “the court of the first instance”.

G. The 7th day of the judgment of the court of first instance stated “3. Judgment on this case’s defense” as “2. Judgment on this case’s defense”

H. The lower court’s 9th 21 to 10th 9 pages are deleted.

I. Ten pages of the judgment of the first instance.

arrow