The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended in the trial are all dismissed.

Any extension of the cost of appeal shall accrue.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s internal hospital and surgery 1) around 2005: (a) around 2005, the Plaintiff was a patient suffering from choscing disease from a medical specialist in the C Hospital; (b) there was symptoms that the body weight increase of 8-10km around 201, and that croscing from a medical specialist in the C Hospital, and (c) the Plaintiff was diagnosed on February 15, 201 that the brain croscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”). The Defendant E Hospital working for D on March 12, 2012 (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).

(2) On March 14, 2012, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on March 14, 2012 (hereinafter “instant surgery”). The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the companionary brain bruor remal approach (TSA and rumrereval, endronal approach, hereinafter “instant surgery”).

D In the instant surgery, she removed the species, and took measures for her blood transfusion using the terrings on the part of the body where the flachi was the species.

B. (1) After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff did not appear on March 15, 2012, when he returned to the sick room after the instant surgery. On March 15, 2012, the Plaintiff complained of the same symptoms even after the instant surgery took place. The medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital claimed the same symptoms. At around 07:07 on the same day, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital did not observe the Plaintiff, but did not have any specific opinion in addition to the surgery from the surgery. (2) On March 15, 2012, the Plaintiff was in a state where the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital appears to have a far left eye on the part of the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital at around 10:00, and the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital began the surgery with the possibility of re-operation in mind to the Plaintiff at around 13:30 on the same day.

At around 17:00 on the same day, the Plaintiff expressed to the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital that it was humped to security or a A.M. outside of the left eye, but thereafter complained that there is no sense without being humped.

At around 22:52 on the same day, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital was conducting a re-examination of the CT to conduct an emergency operation for the Plaintiff, and there was no special change.

3. The Plaintiff on March 15, 2012