logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.17 2015고단7605
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of two thousand won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Majority Relations] On August 16, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment with prison labor and 4 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court on May 16, 2014, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on May 16, 2014. On October 22, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to 1 year and 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Seoul Central District Court and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 15, 2016.

Defendant

B On July 16, 2015, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced 10 months to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, which became final and conclusive on July 24, 2015.

[Criminal facts] The Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

1. Defendant A was tried on July 16, 2015 by a criminal court of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court No. 525 located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) at around 10:15, and was under trial together.

B, stroke-m (name of the product "stroke") from B, carried it by stroke-m (name of the product) 7.

2. Defendant B was tried on July 16, 2015 by a criminal court of Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court No. 525 located in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) at around 10:15, and was tried together with the trial.

A accepted a stroke m (the product name "stroke") 7 pat (the product name "stroke"), a local mental medicine, by giving and receiving it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the first trial record;

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant B;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Notification of the result of legal and chemical appraisal;

1. Previous convictions: inquiries into criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment of the text of the judgment), the number of individuals, the status of acceptance, the judgment of the Defendants related to the Defendants, and the confirmation data on the judgment of the case [the exemption of this case contains a stroke m, which is a local mental medicine, and it is possible for the Defendants to deal with the stroke m., and the stroke m.

arrow