Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On March 15, 2019, at around 14:00, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-ro 39, Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, as a witness, at the Daegu District Court Decision 2, the defendant's obstruction of the performance of justice against B and C (the above Court Decision 2019Da1182, 1285).

The defendant answer B's defense counsel "I cannot see the question "B has directed the witness to interfere with the inspection of 2-1 Section 2-1 Section", and answer to the question "I am the witness asked "I am the witness asked that "I am the meeting in Seoul and I am the direction to prevent the inspection of 2-1 Section 2-1 Section 2" in the prosecutor's investigation, and I am the answer to the question "I am well aware of the fact. I am the memory will be well known," and the prosecutor's answer to the question "I am this and my position will not be changed, and it will be true."

However, according to B’s instructions, the Defendant was to close down the inspection process of 2-1 construction sites of Dunified Business, to newly install without any hole, or to place without any hole in the existing inspection process.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement against his memory.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of the examination record of the witness, and a transcript of the recording;

1. A copy of the protocol of examination of witness and recording in relation to C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to separate judgments on suspects);

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Statutory mitigation under Articles 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not likely to impair the judicial function of the State by hindering the court from hearing to find the truth, but the crime is deemed to be committed by the defendant.